Pages

Tuesday, 12 May 2026

What We Learnt at School—and What We Needed to Know

 


Shared with Friends; Except: Acquaintances
What We Learnt at School—and What We Needed to Know
Having spent most of my working life in education, I should begin with a disclaimer: this is a light-hearted reflection, written with respect, gratitude, and a dash of cheek. For all the good schooling gave us, there are moments when one wonders whether so much time needed to be spent on logarithms, rhombuses, and the reproductive habits of flowers.
I spent a good part of my school years learning trigonometry, logarithms, and the properties of a rhombus—knowledge that, hand on heart, has not once been used in everyday life. Not once in a supermarket aisle have I thought, “Now is the moment for sine and cosine.” Nor have I ever been rescued in conversation by a four-sided figure with equal sides.
There was also the business of quadratic equations, compass-drawn circles, chemical equations, and stalactites and stalagmites—useful perhaps if one is ever stranded in a cave with a ruler, a chemistry set, and an exam paper.
Then came the classics: two trains leaving different stations at different speeds, calculating when they meet—or the length of a platform that could have been measured in a minute with a tape and some common sense. I always wondered why trains were involved at all, and why they always seemed to be travelling at what can only be described as emergency velocity.
Much of school life involved memorising capitals, rivers, mountain ranges, flower parts, and enough of the periodic table to sound confident for forty-five minutes in an exam hall—before much of it quietly faded soon after.
There were also the rituals: books wrapped in brown paper, headings underlined in red, margins drawn with precision, pencils sharpened to a point, and the belief that neat handwriting reflected character. Learning often meant repetition, and repetition was presented as understanding.
Yet many of the things that matter most in life were barely touched.
How money works. How to speak so people listen. How to listen properly. How to handle failure. How to disagree without conflict. How to build relationships. How to think in a noisy world. How to manage stress, sleep, food, and health. How to bend without breaking when life throws a googly.
These lessons were learned elsewhere—through experience, mistakes, and people who stepped in when it mattered most.
Thankfully, that picture is changing fast.
Schools are moving away from the old factory model: rows of silent children, all taught the same thing, expected to memorise and reproduce it, and then move on. In its place is a more connected and practical approach to learning.
There is now greater emphasis on understanding over memorising, skills over repetition, curiosity over compliance, and application over recall. Learning is being drawn closer to the real world students will enter.
Communication, collaboration, creativity, resilience, problem-solving, digital awareness, wellbeing, and ethical thinking are no longer optional extras. They are central to education.
Knowledge still matters. But in a world where information is instantly available, discernment matters more. The real skill is knowing what to trust, what to question, and how to think clearly.
That, ultimately, is what education should aim for—not simply to fill minds, but to shape them to think, adapt, and grow.
And while I remain quietly grateful that I can still recognise a rhombus at fifty paces, I’m glad the next generation may leave school better prepared for life—not merely for exams, but for the far messier business of living it.

Wednesday, 22 April 2026

When the sun rises.....

 “When the sun rises, it rises for everyone” — Cuban proverb

Every morning begins the same way. The sun doesn’t negotiate or select. It simply rises—same sky, same light, same start for all.

And yet, outcomes are never the same.

If the beginning is equal, what creates the difference?

It is what we bring into the day. Dedication. Consistency. The discipline to show up fully, even when it is inconvenient. The ability to make intelligent, decisive choices when things are unclear—calm decisions, not hurried ones. Grounded, steady thinking.

In school leadership, this becomes visible very quickly.

Each school day is a shared sunrise. Same timetable, same systems, same expectations. But culture is not built by structure—it is shaped by leadership. By tone set early. By standards held without fluctuation. By quiet follow-through that builds trust rather than noise. By decisions that are firm, fair, and uncluttered.

Equally important is the atmosphere we create: peace in the environment, calm in minds, dignity in how people are treated and spoken to. Schools don’t need constant intensity; they need clarity without chaos. When leadership is steady, people settle. When decisions are calm, confidence rises. When expectations are consistent, behaviour follows.

And at the centre of it all are people—teachers carrying responsibility, students carrying potential, families placing trust in the system. Progress comes when that ecosystem is held together with care, not pressure. Innovation matters too, but only when it is purposeful—improving learning, not complicating it.

The proverb, then, is not about fairness. It is about responsibility.

The light is given. The difference lies in how it is used.

So the question is simple:

When the sun rises tomorrow, what will we do with it?

The Quiet power of choice

 

When constant availability starts to cost more than it gives

It is early morning and the day has barely started, yet attention is already being pulled in different directions as the phone lights up, messages arrive, and before you’ve even settled into your morning, your focus has shifted elsewhere.

What should be a simple start quickly becomes a chain of interruptions—requests, clarifications, replies that seem small on their own but together fragment focus and quietly break rhythm.

Here is something worth noting: not every message requires an answer, not every misunderstanding needs immediate repair, and not every moment of urgency deserves immediate attention.

Yet reaction becomes automatic. Everything starts to feel immediate, and in that constant pull of urgency, something important is quietly lost.

People who are always available often end up the most drained, while those who are selective with their time tend to remain steadier—not distant, just less scattered.

Because attention is not elastic. Every unnecessary response takes something away—clarity, focus, calm.

That is where the pause matters. Not avoidance, not withdrawal, but a small deliberate space between what happens and how you respond, where reaction gives way to choice.

And in that space, something shifts: you stop reacting by default and begin responding with intent. The day feels less rushed, less reactive, more deliberate.

When everything receives an immediate answer, everything begins to feel the same. Importance flattens, urgency blurs, and over time attention spreads too thin to hold anything properly.

You see it everywhere. Some people are always available—replying instantly, explaining constantly, reachable at all times. Others are more selective; they show up when it matters and step back when it doesn’t, and their presence feels quieter but more grounded.

There is something similar in nature. A cat does not chase every sound or movement; it moves on its own terms—not out of distance, but awareness.

Modern life makes this harder. Messages, groups, work chats, family threads—everything feels urgent, even when most of it isn’t. Most things can wait longer than we assume.

And when you begin to see that clearly, something shifts. Many situations settle without immediate involvement. Some concerns fade. Some conversations lose weight on their own.

What remains is not distance from life, but a more deliberate way of engaging with it—where time and attention are no longer automatically surrendered, but consciously given.

Leaving a message for later is not avoidance; it is structure. It is simply the recognition that attention is not a constant obligation.

And slowly, clarity returns.

There is a quiet discipline in this: not reacting out of habit, not explaining instantly, not feeling responsible for every interruption.

Over time, it doesn’t make you distant; it makes you more grounded, more in control of your own time and energy.

And in that steadiness, something becomes clear—you are no longer being pulled everywhere, because not everything deserves access to you.
You decide what does.

Not everything that reaches you deserves a response.