Hotels, Malls, Banks — The Great Indian Security Ritual
How often have you walked into a bank and seen an ageing security guard quietly doing his duty? Or stood in a queue outside a mall, waiting to pass through a metal detector? Or driven into a hotel and watched the familiar security routine unfold around your car?
We have all seen it, experienced it and, for the most part, simply accepted it as part of everyday life.
I was recently on holiday in India and found myself wondering whether some of these familiar security rituals have become more about following a routine than actually improving protection.
Let me make one thing clear: this is not a criticism of the security personnel. Most are simply doing what they have been instructed to do. Many work long hours for modest salaries and in difficult conditions. They deserve our respect.
My question is whether the systems behind them are keeping pace with the threats they are supposed to address.
Enter almost any decent hotel with your car and luggage and the routine begins. At the gate, the guard asks you to open the bonnet and the boot — or “dicky”, as we call it in India. He peers inside both, while nobody seems particularly interested in looking inside the car itself.
Then comes the dog, wandering around the vehicle, followed by the familiar small mirror on a long pole, pushed underneath the car.
I am sure these checks have a purpose. But when the same procedure is repeated thousands of times, you cannot help wondering whether it is still effective or simply a ritual everyone has become accustomed to.
The same happens at shopping malls. You queue, reach the metal detector and the scanner beeps. Keys come out, then the phone, then the belt, until eventually you are practically empty-handed.
And I wonder: how many criminals are going to patiently stand in a queue of 40 people waiting for their turn?
To be fair, Indian airport security is a different matter altogether. At least with me, they are extremely stringent. I sometimes wonder whether they have information that I don't have. Perhaps I look dangerous. Or suspicious. Or maybe I simply have an honest face that requires further investigation!
But there is another question that troubles me far more.
What happens if a security guard actually finds something dangerous?
At a hotel or mall, if a scanner indicates something genuinely suspicious, or a guard discovers something concerning, does he know what to do next? Who does he call? Whom does he inform? Does he know how to isolate the area, alert the right people and keep others away?
These are ordinary people trying to earn a living. They may have limited education, long working hours and difficult circumstances. Yet we place them at the front line of our security systems.
Have we given them enough training to deal with the one situation we hope they never encounter?
Then there are banks, where an elderly security guard often sits at the entrance holding a rifle that sometimes looks as though it has been there since the days of fountain pens and handwritten cheques.
Again, I am not making fun of the guard. I am questioning whether the system is giving him the tools, training and support he needs.
Security is important, and the people carrying out these checks are doing a necessary and often thankless job. But systems cannot remain unchanged simply because they have always been followed.
Security procedures need to be reviewed, updated and made more intelligent. A routine that everyone knows and mechanically follows can gradually lose its effectiveness.
The people doing these jobs are clearly trying their best. But is trying your best enough to keep a place secure?
That is the real question.
The system must give them the right training, technology and information, along with a clear understanding of what to do when something genuinely goes wrong.
Because security matters too much to become a ritual.
The people may be doing their best. But is the system doing its best to keep us safe?